American Conservative

Reply to Lying Liars and their Lies in Politics JoeUser Forums

The term isn't derisive to those who are neocons Anthony. The pseudoconservative Trotskyites who follow the teachings of Leo Strauss and go by the names of Kristol, Feith, Wolfowitz, Perle and Ledeen among others. Neoconservatism is un-American and a very dangerous philosophy. Real conservative patriots fight neoconservatism tooth and nail and if leftists or liberals want to join us, fine. We can use the manpower. You seem to think that support of Israel is some patriotic litmus test.

Reply to Lying Liars and their Lies in Politics JoeUser Forums

Anthony R, Here you are claiming that Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan are "Nazis" and "not conservatives." That's a VERY liberal habit my young friend...and it is more than clear that you have no idea what Ron Paul stands for and are relying on 3rd parties to tell you what Buchanan stands for. Grow up and if you're going to act like a liberal you may as well proclaim yourself one. Buchanan and Ron Paul are among the few TRUE conservatives out there. You on the otherhand are just another Israel-fir

Reply to Lying Liars and their Lies in Politics JoeUser Forums

Once again the youngins are misusing the word "conservative." Bush is not a conservative. Neoconservatism is NOT conservatism. People, please use the right words. Words mean something and to misuse them makes you look foolish. The Trotskite notion of "permanent revolution" that the neocons and their worshippers hold so dear is NOT a conservative idea. Any massive and intrusive government body like the Department Of Homeland Security is NOT a conservative concept. Calling yourself a conservative

Wall Street Journal vs. America in Current Events JoeUser Forums

November 3, 2003 issue Copyright © 2003 The American Conservative Wall Street Journal vs. America by Pat Buchanan Commentators have lately begun to point up parallels between the presidency of George W. Bush and that of his father. Both enjoyed extraordinary approval in their third years after triumphs over Saddam Hussein. Both began to slide due to a sickly economy. Both won office on Reaganite rhetoric. But both then left themselves open to a populist revolt by embrac

Reply to DesktopX 2 Public Gamma in Press Room JoeUser Forums

Andrew J. Brehm, You clearly misread me. I don't believe we should've deposed Saddam, I don't believe we should interfere in the affairs of any other nation at all. Truly the conservative position, my views are in line with George Washington's. If we followed his philosophy in the recent past the twin towers would still be standing. Putting Israel first as many administrations have done, but few to the level this one has, puts us all at severe risk. My point was that this admini

Reply to DesktopX 2 Public Gamma in Press Room JoeUser Forums

Anthony, Was Saddam a bad guy? Yeah, he was. But there are plenty of bad guys in the world and several of them are worse. We cannot go around displacing each and every world leader we don't like. If we did, we'd have no time to defend against the REAL threats that lurk out there. Iraq wasn't a threat in any way, shape or form to America and enacting "regime change" and occupation there hasn't served American interests at all. It may have served some American corporation's interests and it cl

Reply to DesktopX 2 Public Gamma in Press Room JoeUser Forums

Draginol, The international law that the Bush cabal broke is the law set down at Nuremberg prohibiting wars of aggression. The embarrassment in Guantanamo is inexcusable. Calling POW's enemy combatants to skirt various international laws and warehousing them in the middle of nowhere to skirt American laws is atrocious.

Reply to DesktopX 2 Public Gamma in Press Room JoeUser Forums

Ron Paul had it about right back in March...and has had it right on this matter for years... 20/03/03 Time to Renounce the United Nations? Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) Our anticipated war in Iraq has been condemned by many around the world for the worst of all reasons: namely, that America is acting without United Nations approval. The obvious implication is that an invasion of Iraq is illegitimate without such approval, but magically becomes legitimate when

Reply to The Bush Doctrine will spell doom to American hegemony in Politics JoeUser Forums

The "Bush Doctrine" is Un-American and ought to be discarded along with the Bush administration and at the same time, the UN.

Reply to DesktopX 2 Public Gamma in Press Room JoeUser Forums

We should've done it years ago. YES, the case is more than clear. The UN is all about stripping ALL nations of their sovereignty and enacting the globalist/socialist wet dream of a New World Order. I don't care if the UN is disbanded...what I care about is having the US get the hell OUT of the UN and the UN OUT of America.

Reply to Hypocricy Wars: Limbaugh vs. The Left in Politics JoeUser Forums

Anthony you're wrong about Buchanan, big time wrong.