Elemental Forums
I like also the art of showing the units. Remeber me a bit of the good old "Magic the Gathering" cards. Nice move!
Besides all of the things already mentioned I liked the battle system: 1st it was turn based - so no need to hurry ;-= 2nd I liked the diversity in the battles, including fortifications, terrain etc.! So many possibilities and the rewards after every battle (upgrading heroes etc.)! Made the most fun for me in that great game!
Elemental Forums
Hello Frogboy, I´m impressed by the depth of the game, even when it just is the handling of tropp sizes. Great job - you develop directly into the way of kind of game I´m long wwaiting for (counting in years...... ;-))
[quote who="pacov" reply="821" id="2543018"] Quoting Busdude, reply 820 Can you put me in tier 2 plz, I've semi-returned and play ocassionally. Also sigils are dishonorable. I was going to say yes until the sigils comment. hehe. Yeah, I remember you. Tier 2 sounds good. Added. [/quote] Ah, that easy is it to enter the Hall of Fame ? ;-)
...and another one, discussing Reg endgame http://www.gamereplays.org/demigod/replays.php?game=51&tab=upcoming&show=details&id=110991
Here´s one for the ongoing discussion .... http://www.gamereplays.org/demigod/replays.php?game=51&tab=upcoming&show=details&id=110977
[quote who="lifekatana" reply="32" id="2537891"]Regulus is just the worst character in the whole game no question about it. [/quote] If I wouldn´t know you a bit, I would lough out loud !
I agree with many people here claiming that Reg is hard to play and if you have a teammate that can´t play him, it gets really hard, since he feeds the enemy often. On the other hand Reg can be a very important supporting character! I always play supporting and going into melee if my partner has a UB or Oak (or Rook). Important is to be mobile all the time, always being out of range of teleport from erebus f.e., but always i nrange of hitting / supporting the enemy. And at
Could it be that the community is shrinking ? Seeing alot of people from this thread recently more often online than much other (unknown) guys. Maybe its just the time I go onlien but when I have a look at Pantheon, which is quite dead, I must admit, that a few months ago there were much more guys online.....
I think he means, that he is the only one searching for a game. Saw this happening alot lately and its increasing! It seems there are not many fans of pantheon left these days !
Hey Gentleman (lol) ! I had the pleasure getting a game going with you yesterday (with Hemp, Orcun, McShane, Alterschism and Zen_God). What I liked was that you don´t make premade games and want a good, balanced game. So you change team members in order of their strength. I played (as Reg) with a great McShane playing Occulus and Orcun (as Erebus) against the other three. Was a real good game and made fun. I would like to take part more often in your games, if cahnces al
[quote who="shred_demon" reply="638" id="2513593"]General Gonzo Howboutnooo and I were really pissing about this entire game tbh ^^ I spent 2 minutes in the middle to get a mug of tea and spent most of the match cracking jokes. Neither of us were playing seriously in the slightest FFS Max (howboutnooo), was playing an autoattack reg build...that's the level we are talking about here It's a build that only works against bad players... <b
As said before: that list above means nothing. Just played a 3on3 against shred_demon who is listed above and was really disappointed by his game. Maybe it was because he played UB, but he was killed several times and he even said "gg", though not ending the game, which we finally still lost because comrades thought citadel upgrades aren´t that important :-( Have a look at the replay and judge afterwards. Comments here are welcome! ok, maybe this works: <a
[quote who="Archon_Saar" reply="609" id="2512666"]well...you know from the other two threads that I second Kevin to the shame/players to avoid list [/quote] Archon, I´m really disappointed by your behaviour. Your just a stats looking guy, giving people no chance. If I hadn´t played that damn pantheon gen vs ass I would have a bout 65% stats like before the patch. Would that have fit you better? I´m ashamed by the "good" players of this community and wil
Yeah, games take too long to be started until teams have found. In addition some 3vs3 or even 4vs4 would be nice. Nowadays I mostly get 1on1s which are frustating if playing Reg vs Erebus or Oak. Hope they change at least the matchup of Assassins vs Generals.
To answer the OP question: no, QoT is not the weakest god, it´s Occulus !
...since many complain about the lacking of stun ability for some demigods, how about a "stun" item, which will stun/interrupt your enemy for a second, cooldown will be 30 sec. !
I think it depends of the role you are playing as Reg. I play him quite alot and always back up an UB, Rook, Erebus or Oak. Sniping in the bgeinning to soften up the target of the mentioned above mates and later then helping outr from behind with mines and focusing on one god. You need speed and attack speed over armor. That´s my experience and I don´t think that Reg is weak lategame, if played well.....
[quote who="Maccilia" reply="457" id="2504286"] yeah and in addition "thatguy..." even kick guys like me, because stats aren´t over 50 or 60%. Due to playing pantheon on assassin side my stats are low - but he didn´t make efforts to let new people play his premade game. That´s no good sportmanship and if most guys on your list above behace like this, you will never attract more people to this game..... We had someone on vent and well we asked if you wer
I´m a huge fan of Pantheon. It´s a bit like roulette if you get teammates who play a good god or if you got feeder for the enemy, which can be frustrating too. It´s more challenging than premade games, where you exactly know whom you fight and what you can expect of the match. It´s a bit more thrilling, especially now with 1on1 being enabled. I only disagree with this epoch, playing assassins vs generals, since generals are so hard to beat if equal skilled play
im above 40% ;-) but stats doen´t say anything about skill. If i had wanted, I would make premade game to push that score...thats senseless !
yeah and in addition "thatguy..." even kick guys like me, because stats aren´t over 50 or 60%. Due to playing pantheon on assassin side my stats are low - but he didn´t make efforts to let new people play his premade game. That´s no good sportmanship and if most guys on your list above behace like this, you will never attract more people to this game.....
Yes, 1o1ns are enabled, but it´s senseless playing a reg vs erebus in 1on1 with equal askilled players. Generals vs Assassins is not the best mode for 1on1 random fights, where you will most of the time met some erbeus players qhile you play a weaker assassin without any support armies....
So many names around here - I guess even you guys don´t know all players who have decent skill because you can´t meet them all on the battlefield. So I think this "elite" list you are going to make shows just a small portion of what good players are around there. I played alot recently, even premade games (played only pantheon the time before since release but generals vs assasssins is very unbalanced if players of same skill clash together), so I met a few guys mentioned
Nice list but what makes me think is that only a handful of the mentioned guys I have ever seen playing pantheon. In my eyes especially pantheon shows skilled players as they have to play with whomever they are put together with. No teamspeak or any tactics trained in premade games with mates. If you can play demigod is shown here. I saw players who managed to win a 3on3 game with 2 leavers meaning 2 AI controlled, money delivering guys to the other team while the other team wasn&acut
Demigod Forums