Yes I have Nvidia on 1 of the ystems the other 2 are ATI, nview is not enable. The Verify Install option in Impulse says it is installed correctly. About says: Your computer has a Windows Experience Index base score of 5.2 (Hard Drive :-( ) Your Windows Graphics Experience score is 7.2 WindowBlinds version : WindowBlinds 7.0 (build 204 - Windows 7 Edition) - 64 bit OS WindowBlinds is installed correctly on this PC WindowB
Windowblinds 7 (Beta 2) seems to work in that it will skin any window active when I run it, but it stops/kills explorer and does not restart it, if I try to restart it it fails to run until I select the Aero Theme (default theme), if I do not have taskmanager running then I can not do anything until I reslect Aero as a theme at which point I can restart explorer, run taskmanager .. as normal. I've played with 3 systems with Windows 7 installed and all three so the exact same issue
I have Windows 7 x64 RTM MSDN copy installed and working with with ATI 9.8 drivers, however after applying any skin except for the default ones that ship with windows I'm unable to do anything until I reapply a default skin. WB7 seems to stop Explorer when applying a skin, but does not restart it, if a default skin is use I can restart it from task manager (gotten to by typing ) if another skin is used then I can not load task manager, I mean it starts, but is not di
I noticed that Rightclick is 1 of only 2 products (the other being windowsFX) that come with Object Desktop that is not supported under 64bit Operating systems, I'm wonder when or if this is going to change? Thanks, ERIC
Stardock Forums
Thanks for the heads up, seems though that the program should be able to determine that the OS is 64bit and not install. ERIC
Stardock Forums
Simple put on Vista x64 SP1 with Impulse (set to "Allow all" on the Firewall), I get the following message: "Downloading Impulse update - Connecting ...", even if I clsoe impulse it continues to run (hung in the background). Starting another copy hangs as well until the first one is manually (through taskmanager) killed. Restarting will allow it to work once in every 3 or so boots, but if it hangs I need to reboot. Also updates have about the same rate of ha
Stardock Forums
Basically had a fully functional install, went to install iconpackager, on the working install, now no icons nothing (ICON Packager will not start at all), even after uninstalling, rebooting and reinstalling and no program in C:\Program Files(x86)\... has an ICON (those in C:\Windows\ have ICONS), now I have to restore and wast another 4.5 hours reconfiguring the system. Not happy and a warning to others! I expect the issue is with Outpost and it blocking some register edit, or else
I bought 2 skins for my colors, before realizing that it is only 32bit, I only have 64bit Operating Systems, Since I own Object Desktop I was only planning on using the components through WindowBlinds and IconPackaer, yet without my color installed I can not even access the components (which obviously makes sense). So what I'm looking for is an ETA on 64bit support. ERIC
Still no ideas?, I always was annoyed that CursorXP would disappear and the default windows pointer would re-appear on resume, however that was better than having to reboot every time as I currently have to do if I leave cursorFX installed, Thanks, ERIC
When running the latest version unde Vista x64 and I resume from hibernation CursorFX uses exactly 1 full core (of which I have 4), until I can open task manager and close this process the system is almost completely unresponsive (take 1+ minutes to respond to a mouse click). When running 2.00.003 I did not see this behaviour, only after updating and rebooting. Has anyone else seen a simular issue?, for teh moment I have uninstalled the program, but this is n
Ive tried 3 systems that I own all three crash before installing the folder icons, I've reinstall XP x64 from scrath and on a new install same thing happens. Error is: AppName: iconpackager64.exe AppVer: 3.2.1.0 ModName: iconpackager64.exe ModVer: 3.2.1.0 Offset: 0000000000021bbe
I would like to take "the plunge", but from what I can tell it does not support Windows XP x64 (or if it does support it then the history, makes it unclear), since installing a copy of WB is a real pain with reboots, and the like, I'm scared to do so until Star Dock says one way or the other. ERIC
Why would anyone want a background that uses CPU cycles?, Like a screen saver a background is suppose to use 0% CPU. It does have a nifty factor (which is why I use WindowBlinds and IconPackager, but neither of them use an real CPU, when idle. As one who pays for Electric and owns Vista Ultimate (for application compatibility testing only), this extension just made no sense.
WinCustomize Forums
Sounds nice, but no mention of x64 support for the tray or tasks. Bummer I would have hoped the next version would support x64 as windowblinds and iconpackager do. ERIC
I just updated window blinds yesterday to 5.00[b].006 now when I try to change skins I get a complete system crash with the message "Logon process crashes". This did not occur prior to the installation of 5.00[b].006 Restoring the system confirmed this issue was new in 5.0[b].006 ERIC
Basicly I've been looking at the skins that support WB5 border transparency, yet even with the newest version of Skinstudio I can not figure out how the boarder transparency is done and how, since the the borders are all BMP images the transparency must be done after the fact and is not part of the image it self, yet I see no option to allow me to confiugure this or for that matter do anything with transparency. I find it very fustrating as I've waste
I know I can add Virtual Desktops to ObjectBar, since Right click is simply a version of ObjectBar why is there no plugin or option to add virtual desktops to this menu? Thanks, ERIC
Now that version 3.0 is out, is there any eta. on support for Windows x64, as these default windows ICONS are giving me a headache. No really I miss the ablity to change the icons from the annoying windows defaults, and as some icons work (such as the start menu), but other such as folders do not I was wondering if there was an eta on full support). ERIC
The newest version of RightClick actually comes up in Windows x64, however it only works once the real right-click menu is visiable for instance if the (standard) right click menu is open then the right-click menu defined by rightclick can be brought up, but otherwise it can not be seen. ERIC
I'll second that, support for x64 would be very nice. Bugs me all the time seeing those ugly windows defalt icons.
Does not look that diffrent from Sysmetrix, which is free.
JoeUser Forums