I don't know if there is a significant difference or not, but I'm curious as to how it's meant to work. If I look at Objectdock, it has a clear timelimit to how long it is in effect. I assume the subscription timelimit is for upgrades and will not limit the use of the applications after it runs out? Also, my separately purchased applications doesn't come with an expirationdate. Does that mean that by buying all components individually I get updates until the end of l
mickeko
Personally I have no clue at all why aero style skins are popular. I don't find them simple and clean. Objectively I know that people have different taste, so I'm not gonna hate you for liking it. :)
Animated wallpaper is nothing other than that if it's running on your desktop. You could take the exact same scene and run it as a screensaver, and it would be just that too. Most animated wallpapers might look awesome, but are still nothing else than a video on repeat... So we could say that most animated wallpapers are NOT REALLY wallpapers, they are videos. Personally I'd say that an animated wallpaper is an animated wallpaper when it's created with the intention of having
[quote who="cplair" reply="4" id="1909020"] Sorry you feel that way, I retract my previous statement good luck [/quote] I think you got me wrong, it was meant as a GOOD thing... They DO lack sparks and shine that serve no other purpose than to steal my focus, which means they are good suggestions because of that. I then added the few reservations as to why they were not the perfect skins for me, in hope of getting something suggested that might be more a
[quote who="Zubaz" reply="1" id="1908966"]Aero? Classic? Luna? [/quote] Ah, I've never really liked the microsoft versions of "professional". They went from ugly to toy to ... well aero.. While it's their best effort, it feels a bit too bulky for my taste. [quote who="cplair" reply="2" id="1908988"] I feel the best theme suited for one's taste is the one you build! But if you want a conservative professional looking style look no
As the subject suggests I'm looking for something entirely different than most of the themes I can see here. I know design is a very subjective issue, specially when it comes to minimalistic no frills designs. I want something that makes my OS look clean while still retaining usability. The main focus of themes here seem to be more on the flashy detailed side than just simple, good looking and effective. Any suggestions? :)
Well, process explorer seems to launch as 64bit. *shrug* I'm waiting for the 64bit native objectdock anyway. There's no excuse for not making it... Using putty for telnet can be accomplished by putting a telnet.bat somewhere early in your path. c:\windows\system32 would be a good place I figure. The contents of that batch file would be (assuming putty is on drive c); c:\path\to\putty.exe -telnet %*
1.90.033 is the latest version of objectdock. I'm assuming they found some problem with the beta that warranted a removal of it from the servers. This implies something more serious than a mere systray issue though, and if it is, you're better off without it until it's resolved.
I tried launching sysinternals processexplorer from the dock, and it correctly starts procexp64.exe. It suggests that it works fine. Also; If you don't use telnet for some obscure reason, I suggest you use PuTTY instead. It's free, open source and also support SSH. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html
What are you on about? Just rightclick the app and choose archive, works just fine on installed software... And you have all the software included in your subscription... Running a beta may result in unwanted effects, it's not what you paid for. You paid for access to the latest stable versions of object dock, having access to beta is just a bonus, it's not included in the price. And give the guys a break, they're only human. It'll get fixed. You think they're j
I was planning a complete stardock wipe with an aggressive mop-up and a dash of lemon, but since the plug was pulled on the affected beta I figure there's no point.
[quote who="Seabass" reply="4" id="1906546"]"wonkey" [/quote] Wonkey, hehe? I suppose that explains that paper-bagged-head-avatar you got in some remotely logical way. :) Anyway, no reason to panic, just get it done right now. ;) (Yes, this IS a joke, you may laugh if you wish. No complaints allowed if you don't. :) )
Actually I've found no indication whatsoever of any update to objectdock at all. It simply stopped working overnight. Which also is implied by some people who hasn't even run impulse or stardock central at all, and also lost their systray. As far as I know there was no patch to vista that night that could explain it. The only thing I can imagine being a problem would be that the system clock somehow is involved in this, as that's the only thing I can recall actually changed between when
Ok, impulse now dropped me back to 1.90.033 and regardless of "show previews" setting it doesn't change. My weather docklet doesnt work which implies a way too old version. Something's fishy... Or is it simply what you tried to tell me but I didnt quite comprehend? :)
I ran the procedure and it still doesn't work. :(
John
[quote who="aufisch" reply="3" id="1904604"] RightClick works fine on Vista64 here, I have been using it for more than a year, and just installed it on a second Vista64-bit system.The only thing that doesn't work on some systems is the WB-skin import feature, which means you have to download and apply the skins manually. [/quote] well, it has never worked for me on any of the systems I've installed it on. Rightclick has always opened the regular contextmenu and I've had to
dictionary
I am timelimit of threads - Your lifetime will be exceeding? .. I'm not so good at this... :)
It doesn't play well with Vista x64 so stay wary. :)
This is an interesting read. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Object desktop really should include the functionality of ultramon, with full support by the other bits and pieces. But then again... Windows should include most of the object desktop functionality too, or atleast allow for this kind of software to actually *replace* the window features they improve on.
I disagree. Dump the different suites alltogether! There should be an automated discount system for people buying multiple software from the suite instead. If I buy windowblinds and then decide to buy the full suite I'm just screwed on my money as this works.
[quote who="BigDogBigFeet" reply="13" id="1903503"] Try reply #9. As I've indicated it seems to be a problem with build 538 installed through Impulse. The problem doesn't appear with Build 537 installed with Stardock Central as indicated by me, Hankers and now TheD2JBug. [/quote] Ah, ofcourse. I didn't really consider rollback as a "fix". Silly me. :)
It would be kind of nice if there was some kind of notification about when software get updated... I don't see a fix btw?
This is quite funny, just now I experienced the same issue. Guess there's a little something going on. :) Windows Vista x64 SP1 here...