Home | Recent Posts New Topic
Nethog61
Nethog61
Join Date 03/2006
0

Is Free Trade Agreement broken?

December 31, 2016 10:33:52 AM from Galactic Civilizations III ForumsGalactic Civilizations III Forums

I established a Free Trade Agreement with the Thalans playing the Contingency part of the base game campaign. If I hover over the FTA help text it states "Give a 25% bonus to the wealth of both civilizations through the sharing of Markets". I have observed a zero increase in income. Is this a known bug with 1.9?

Regards,

Nethog

Locked Post
Search this post
Advanced Search
Subscription Options
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Nethog61
mortili
Join Date 05/2013
+19
Reply #1 December 31, 2016 10:47:09 AM
from Galactic Civilizations III ForumsGalactic Civilizations III Forums

Its a bug since beta(?),

it actually only gives a wealth-bonus to the recieving faction,

the same is true for the other treatys as well.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Nethog61
Nethog61
Join Date 03/2006
0
Reply #2 December 31, 2016 1:12:01 PM
from Galactic Civilizations III ForumsGalactic Civilizations III Forums

Thanks. Is it possible to trade FTA for FTA from the other party to make FTA work as it should?

Regards

Nethog

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Nethog61
jirkaesch
Join Date 08/2008
+11
Reply #3 January 1, 2017 2:41:16 PM
from Galactic Civilizations III ForumsGalactic Civilizations III Forums

It is utterly broken, like most of the diplomatic contracts. Treaties are doing something different than described, non-agression can be broken any time, when your allies are attacked you don´t even get a dialogue prompting you to join them or break the alliance. Even Total War games have this and in Stardock games diplomacy is broken in this regard since FE

Hopefully it gets fixed some day...

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Nethog61
TheFunMachine
Join Date 06/2013
+14
Reply #4 January 1, 2017 8:32:35 PM
from Galactic Civilizations III ForumsGalactic Civilizations III Forums

Agreed, the treaty aspect to diplomacy need a complete overhaul. Alliances appear to be only pre-requisites to a victory condition, rather than a strategic arrangement that could help weaker powers fend of attacks. 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Nethog61
Nethog61
Join Date 03/2006
0
Reply #5 January 1, 2017 9:02:45 PM
from Galactic Civilizations III ForumsGalactic Civilizations III Forums

Ok thanks. I am a little disappointed that a game that has been out for quite a while now still has broken gameplay, especially from a company like Stardock.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Nethog61
jirkaesch
Join Date 08/2008
+11
Reply #6 January 2, 2017 8:51:50 AM
from Galactic Civilizations III ForumsGalactic Civilizations III Forums

Quoting Nethog61,
reply 5

Ok thanks. I am a little disappointed that a game that has been out for quite a while now still has broken gameplay, especially from a company like Stardock.

Yeah. Surprisingly, Stardock would be precisely the kind of company I would expect to strongly focus on Diplomacy aspect of the game. Yet believe me, some of the issues (useless alliances) are being discussed since Fallen Enchantress, which is maybe like 5 years ago.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Stardock Forums v        Server Load Time:   Page Render Time: