I agree. I answered "I Agree" on that. The government's job isn't to try to control unemployment but rather to provide support for an economy that will create jobs.
I've always thought stability, more than support. Businesses need stability so they can plan and invest and grow. They need to grow their company in order to create more jobs. Inflation, or an unstable currency, is instability and is ruinous to job creation.
I think in this case we probably mean the same thing (though please correct me if I'm wrong). I'm personally leery of speaking positively about government "support" of business because what people call government support of business is largely agnostic. Everything the government does can be spun as support of the economy. Government support can certainly be a positive influence. But it can also be hundreds of millions of dollars poured into some political clown's favorite project that never had a hope of being realized.
Stability through stable monetary policy and clear, straight-forward regulations that create an even and predictable business climate. That's the ticket.
Edit: As an aside thanks for posting this. I sent it to my wife while she was at work and it turned into a spur of the moment dinner conversation as we compared our results and discussed what differences might have led to our different scores. Made for a great meal.