But the SCC alone along with psionic beams and a little bit of miniaturization is all you need to put up 5 or so cargo hulls full of psionic beams and that's enough to ensure your "apparent" military superiority for a decent period of time. Certainly it also doesn't hurt if you trade for the AI's fighters prior to taking any kind of action. In fact in many cases you don't even really need the SCC, you can just trade for all the AI's armed ships leaving them with none and you with enough of an advantage to pretty much do what you want.

However in either case the AI's will respond and if you let it go too long then they will build enough ships to overcome your superiority and so there is an element of proper timing to this as well. You don't want to put up your SCC and the ships under it too soon before you really need to use that military advantage or you'll lose it and gain nothing for it.

Note that with a decent enough diplomatic advantage and having a few techs to trade that the AI values highly you can actually get the AI to trade you *planets* for a tech. Things like Expert miniaturization for example can usually be traded outright for an AI's planet *plus* some cash. You can also get a planet for enhanced and advanced miniaturization together. Using those three techs alone you can get 2 planets from each of the 9 AI opponents and suddenly you are well above the AI's planet count, however you do need the diplomatic advantage to swing the deal.

Also extreme colonization, heavy gravity and aquatic world colonization are usually worth a planet each plus some spare change. However the other extreme colonization techs (toxic, barren, radioactive) are worthless to the AI's.

Diplomacy is really pretty much "the dark side" of GalCiv2. There's a lot you can do with it but if you go too far down that path it's hard to go back and it can take out the fun that you used to have just slugging it out with the AI.

One thing to do is to exclude races with inherent diplomacy abilities which are the Drath at 30%, the Terrans at 25% and the Krynn at 25%. It seems (to me anyway) that the Terrans have some kind of "extra" diplomatic ability even over and above the Super Diplomat Super Ability so I always exclude the Drath and the Terrans. Also you clearly don't want to include a race with the Super Diplomat Super Ability. Of course you can make life easier for yourself if you take the Super Diplomat Super Ability but I usually don't do that either.

I do in general want the Krynn in the mix and they are usually the most difficult in my games to manage however the point is that I usually have at least Expert Diplomacy if not Majesty prior to talking to the AI's (usually by Mar 8th but in general no later than April 1st) but I also need to have Diplomatic Translators. Also note that there's a one turn delay between completing a diplomatic tech or building a diplomatic wonder and the AI's actually realizing that your diplomatic advantage has increased. They actually seem to go by the timeline graph in your civilization manager.

You know, I have to say that the more I think about it, the more I think psionic beams are overpowered. Not just in comparison with 'normal' weapons, either, but compared to the Psionic Missile and the evil mass driver weapon (Psionic Shredder?), it's just far beyond either of them. If I intend to go evil, I will always focus on beam weapons regardless of what the AIs are using, and this is, in my view, a bad thing, as I like the rock-paper-scissors weapons system of GalCiv. In my current game as the Drengin I am fighting four AIs at once, and am winning most of the battles thanks to my ships with psionic beam, even against the Iconians  who are technologically far beyond anyone else (they have the missile after Photon Torpedoes is, highest logistics of any race, and large and possibly huge hulls).

I'm sure this issue has been discussed plenty of times before on the forums, but I still think that the psionic beam is one of the most unbalanced 'things' (i.e., super abilities, ethical features, unique techs, etc.) in the game.

How did this thread get on this topic anyway?

Really?

V1.4 can't buy when in debt.  Is that your opinion too?

Well then, your dumber than I thought.  That's the point.

Ah, then why reply?

ty for the grammatical correction.

We both know that is not true.  Omniscience is not a requirement.  Why expose yourself to another lie?

It's rather funny how things progress.

In the real world you could not continue to produce anything if you had run out of money, either.

Yet, in this real world we are seeing it more and more. All it takes is to print some more money to spread around.

California is bankrupt, yet they keep going. The U.S. is in much the same boat, yet it keeps going. Other countries in the world the same.

I thought the old way was more realistic as well. But it seems the devs are going the way of the world, to allow infinite credit and ambiguity where none is due. No penalty for spending more than you make.

It's all a game now - both in the game world, and the real.

But where, and how, does it stop? In the end, there will not always be a rich Big Brother to bail you out. It is a house of cards, just waiting for a little puff of passing wind.

Again, you never have a credit balance - you either have cash on hand, or you have a negative cash balance.

In other words, you are bankrupt.

Most of the time going below zero bc's does not do anything and this is indicated by your balance appearing in orange. Most things that are prohibited are prohibited at the -500bc level and at that level your balance is shown in red. The other colors used are yellow which indicates that your balance is above zero but you're losing money each turn so if you're not careful you will eventually go below zero and green that indicates both that your balance is above zero and that you're net income is zero or above indicating you are in no danger of going below zero.

Ideally everything would work the same which is that going below zero i.e. orange is a warning however you still can purchase something if you so choose but once red you can't purchase anything until at least back above the -500bc mark. However there are both bugs that make this not universally true as well as multiple ways to purchase things and some ways get blocked but others may not.

In fact in DA v1.80g which was a standard for quite some time there was a bug that allowed you to purchase ships no matter how negative your balance. At some point prior or at the current revision of DA v2.01 this bug got fixed but it got fixed at the wrong level and so now as soon as you go below zero you can no longer purchase ships.

The one functionality that seems universally correct is the ability to research tech. In every rev and version of the game that I know of you can research only as long as your balance is above -500bc but below that all research is shut off. However even in this case in all of the recent and even not so recent revisions of DL and DA you can get military or social production by using focus from research even though otherwise all research and production is shut down. I *think* but am not sure that TA has fixed this bug.

The other things like buying buildings is more a matter of there being multiple ways to buy buildings and some get turned off, like you can't buy buildings from the planet screen while more than -500bc in debt but you can do it from the F1 planet list as well as the colony list in the civilization manager.

Then there's things like upgrading ships that you can do in all possible methods even with your balance below -500bc which historically you were unable to do.

Clearly the intent was for everything to work as I described above in the second paragraph because that's the way the game worked in the days before DA was released. Once DA was released and DL was essentially reved to work as a subset of DA was when these bugs were introduced. So to answer your question I would say that anyone that's been around long enough to have seen the history and evolution of this functionality would acknowledge that bankrupt is a balance of -500bc's or less and that the intent of the game is to prohibit research, production and discretionary expenditures until no longer "bankrupt".

Also note that if you stay bankrupt for long periods of time this has a negative effect on your approval. It can take a few years but eventually this forces you to end the game otherwise you begin to lose population.