My vote too.

Can't anyone crumple this thread up and throw it away?

Does every stinking, ugly, virulent, hateful emotion/statement have to be made before this thing is ended?

Very much like "If a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it, it didn't fall."

But that's ok with me, and perhaps good advice since no one can ever convince anyone else about this stuff.

I've given the original post a rethought . I originally thought 'time for a failboat because , well , it's fail' but I now think he may have a point in a limited manner , if you look at it a certain way. It all depends on what you consider to be 'WC'

The ads are external. Anyone who buys poltical banner ads would get them posted on anything that has politcal in it.. You see it on Youtube all the time. Stardock had limited control of it. So that premise is fail. BTW,So much for the Liberal Internet

However:

If you consider WC to be a 'Community' ( just WC , not the skinning community as a whole' ) I would disagree with WC being anti-Obama . The opinions expressed on the variety of threads on the subject were on both sides.

If you consider WC( and it's associated sites , since we just can't get away from JoeUser ) fourm moderation and such , I would think that there definately IS a anti-Obaama bias to an extent . There have been threads left open ( Island_Dog's for example ) that now appear to have devolved to a gigantic 'Lets see who the liberals are so the conservatives can badmouth them' troll. Ask yourself , would an Obama troll tread have lasted that long?

I don't expect it to change. And I'm not about to 'toss my toys out the pram' . I'm just asking that instead of blind 'no it's not ' that people look at it critically.

How about we NOT SEE IT AT ALL

I didn't sign up for JoeUser.

This originated on WC. The general discussion forum is only on WC.

Why would the anti christ need an election? Wouldn't he just cast some more magic and *poof*?

How is this person posting without subscribing, or am I confused?  If we pay to be ad free and to use the forums then WC should block the ticks when found.  IMHO

Please feel free to point out the wording in terms of service where it states that members who do not subscribe must "pay for their usage" in any way, shape or form.

*shrug*  The ads on the page help pay for the operation of the site and offset the costs incurred by members of the community who do not/are not able to subscribe to support the site more directly.

There is nothing in the terms saying you have to pay.  But there's nothing in the terms saying we won't make use of web adverts to generate revenue to run the site.

According to the scriptures, he will be a well liked , elected official. Maybe I should not have gotten into this here. I'm not sure this is the place to get into one's religious beliefs.

You can't be serious?