different? as in different laws of physics?
Different like "I haven't eat for age", "I am famished", and "I am hungry". They all essentially say the same thing in different way not different everything.
and I said; if you needed to be an expert, I wouldnt be talking about it.
then again, oh ye who masters hypocrisy, how can you critique me if indeed you do not know?
How can I not critique something that I see full of letters and words that scream I am wrong?
How about a PhD?
I know a Uncle who has Phd but isn't consider a scientist(Animal Doctor and not those nurses or any of orderlies).
I think this is the point where I pity your education.
nah, I'll just go higher mr. T.
What education?-End Sarcasm Let not get all Mister here.
no, just not being a dumbass is a fine enough qualification.
Well you certainly sound like a dumbass to me therefore promoted yourself to be demoted to not understanding chemistry and what not. BTW this is a joke.
and in either the understanding of "warrant" or "repertoir"
yes, I shall now riddile my sentances with intentional errors just to annoy yuo.
That didn't annoy me at all.
Now your missing a few articles, and you raelly do have to work on sentance structure. To me it almost looks like your taking the words from schem's sentances and copying and pasting them together until they make some kind of meaningless jumble of worlds.
I was saying "are you saying this?". Which may be why my jumbles sound like schem wrote them.
You have your own errors. Mostly in s and commas.
I bow to you. I don't deny that I indeed make mistakes however the same can't be said for schem.